The Thought Police
The European Union seeks to appease Muslim extremists who, in response to a newspaper cartoon, threaten violence, and the Bush administration, Christopher Hitchens tells us, is happy to oblige:
As well as being a small masterpiece of inarticulacy and self-abnegation, the statement from the State Department about this week's international Muslim pogrom against the free press was also accidentally accurate.
"Anti-Muslim images are as unacceptable as anti-Semitic images, as anti-Christian images, or any other religious belief."
Thus the hapless Sean McCormack, reading painfully slowly from what was reported as a prepared government statement. How appalling for the country of the First Amendment to be represented by such an administration.
The EU says that freedom of expression must be balanced against respect for religious beliefs. But respect cannot be codified--at least not in free societies. No one can force me to respect your beliefs, nor you mine. And that freedom means nothing unless we are able to express it. Again, Hitchens:
...there is a strong case for saying that the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, and those who have reprinted its efforts out of solidarity, are affirming the right to criticize not merely Islam but religion in general. And the Bush administration has no business at all expressing an opinion on that. If it is to say anything, it is constitutionally obliged to uphold the right and no more. You can be sure that the relevant European newspapers have also printed their share of cartoons making fun of nuns and popes and taunting child-raping priests. There was a time when this would not have been possible. But those taboos have been broken.
Which is what taboos are for.
Perhaps it is no surprise, then, that the Vatican should issue this statement:
"The right to freedom of thought and expression ... cannot entail the right to offend the religious sentiment of believers," the Vatican said in its first statement on the controversy.
Um, so, does believers include, say, those who worship Satan? People have used religion to justify all manner of wrongs, all manner of evil. Orthodox Jews believe any representation of God is wrong, and won't even write out his name. Should they react with violence and condemnation when this taboo is violated?
Europe is understandly afraid of provoking its growing Muslim population, and whipping the fanatics among them into a frenzy. Certainly, it is vital for the West to continue to make clear that it is not waging a war on Islam, but on violent extremism.
But Europeans more than anyone should understand the dangers of appeasement. It merely encourages more demands, more threats, more violence, until one is left with no choice but to answer in kind.
(See also Andrew Sullivan on this topic.)
2 Comments:
I agree with the general premise that we should stand up for free speech in even its most vile forms. That's why I agree with Hitchens on this point.
What I have issue with regarding this whole situation with the Danes, the EU, and those who have been screaming free speech is that if you are going to provoke someone, a group, company, or people with your words, drawings or actions don't write a check your butt can't cash.
This is the typical response from those on the right who want to poke the stick in the hornets nest that is the Muslim world and then claim ignorance when they get stung and expect the rest of us to save their asses while there only response is to repeat that the hornets are acting uncivilized.
On an another note, I find it humorous as well that the right are screaming the rights of free speech and expression when you make fun of Muslims and their faith, but to point out the violation of civil rights at a funeral of a civil rights leader and it's uncivilized.
8:40 PM
I would agree, DJ, that there is such a thing as discretion. Just because you can do a thing does not mean you should do a thing. But for Western leaders to suggest that because some people are reckless in exercising their freedom, than the rest of us should have less of it, is outrageous. And to do it in the face of violence sets an awful precedent.
10:55 AM
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home